[ad_1]
Because the Allahabad Excessive Court docket refused to provide any reduction to the Muslim facet within the Gyanvapi Mosque case, the All India Muslim Private Legislation Board (AIMPLB) on Friday (February 2) expressed “shock” over the court docket’s ruling and alleged that the Muslim facet was not given an opportunity to current its facet on the matter. The AIMPLB mentioned that they might transfer the Supreme Court docket towards the order of the court docket and in addition search appointment from President Droupadi Murmu.
This comes after Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee, which manages Gyanvapi mosque in Varanasi did not get any reduction from the Allahabad Excessive Court docket on Friday because it filed a plea difficult a Varanasi court docket’s order permitting Hindus to carry out prayers within the southern cellar of the mosque.
AIMPLB addresses press convention
Addressing a press convention, AIMPLB chief Saifullah Rahmani mentioned that the Excessive Court docket’s choice has given a “massive shock” to the Muslims in addition to the secular individuals of the nation.
“Gyanvapi case has given an enormous shock to twenty crore Muslims in addition to secular individuals. At present, secular Hindus and Sikhs are all unhappy and shocked. It’s mentioned that Muslims demolished the temples and constructed mosques over them, which is completely false. Islam doesn’t enable this,” he mentioned.
“If Muslims had thought that we must always construct temples on different individuals’s land, then would the temples have remained for thus a few years when Muslims had been in energy?” he requested.
Terming the Excessive Court docket’s ruling as “disappointing”, Rahmani alleged that there’s a “separate regulation for majority” within the courts. He additionally cited the Supreme Court docket’s verdict on the Ram Mandir subject in 2019 and mentioned that the Babri Masjid was not constructed by demolishing the temple.
“The selections of the courts are disappointing. Within the Gyanvapi case, the opposite celebration was not given an opportunity to current its views within the court docket. There’s a separate regulation for almost all within the courts. Identical choice was taken in Ram temple additionally. The temple was by no means demolished there to construct the mosque. Our courts are additionally following the trail of breaking individuals’s belief. We remorse that when individuals of all religions collectively gave martyrdom, now everybody just isn’t being seen equal,” the AIMPLB chief alleged.
“We’ll transfer Supreme Court docket towards the choice of the Allahabad Excessive Court docket. We’ll ask for an appointment with the President,” he introduced.
Arshad Madani alleges court docket’s ruling based mostly on religion
Maulana Arshad Madani, additionally current on the press convention, mentioned that the decision on Babri Masjid opened the way in which for such choices.
“The Babri Masjid choice opened the way in which for these individuals.. The choice was taken not based on the regulation however on the premise of religion. The court docket is seeing what the bulk society needs. The identical choice is taken,” Madani alleged.
Mahmood Madani alleged that there’s a massive query mark on India’s judicial system.
“There’s a massive query mark on India’s judicial system. There’s a massive query mark on India’s judicial system. The upper courts usually are not prepared to listen to it on account of technical causes. The place ought to we go?” he mentioned.
“The matter shouldn’t escalate to such an extent that issues worsen.. It’s everybody’s accountability to take the nation ahead. We’re being handled like enemies,” he alleged.
Gyanvapi case
Earlier, a Varanasi Court docket requested the District Justice of the Peace (DM) to make preparations for ‘Puja/Raga-Bhoga’ of Idols inside Mosque’s Southern Cellar (Vyas Ji Tahkhana).
The Muslim facet filed a plea in district court docket looking for a keep for 15 days on puja contained in the basement. The Hindu facet additionally filed a caveat, looking for that it needs to be heard earlier than the court docket passes any order.
The matter was talked about earlier than Performing Chief Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta by senior advocate SFA. Naqvi and he was requested to maneuver an pressing itemizing plea earlier than the Registrar Itemizing.
The event comes after the Supreme Court docket refused to urgently hear the Mosque Committee’s plea towards the order permitting puja in Vyas Ji ka Tehkhana, situated on the southern cellar of the Mosque.
The Varanasi District Decide had directed the district administration to make applicable preparations inside 7 days for Hindus to conduct worship rituals inside one of many sealed cellars (Vyas ji ka tehkhana) inside the prevailing Gyanvapi mosque advanced.
ALSO READ | Puja to proceed inside Gyanvapi advanced as Allahabad HC refuses to provide reduction to Muslim facet
[ad_2]
Supply hyperlink
